0.09/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.09/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 960
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 120
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 03:14:30 EDT 2022
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.46	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.17/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.17/0.46	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.17/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.17/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# full_lambda_6 with pid 15464 completed with status 0
0.17/0.48	# Result found by full_lambda_6
0.17/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.17/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.17/0.48	# ...ProofStateSinE()=165/279
0.17/0.48	# Search class: HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN
0.17/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# new_ho_10 with pid 15466 completed with status 0
0.17/0.48	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.17/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.17/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.17/0.48	# ...ProofStateSinE()=165/279
0.17/0.48	# Search class: HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN
0.17/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.17/0.48	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.17/0.48	
0.17/0.48	# Proof found!
0.17/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_22, type, agent_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_23, type, attribute_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_24, type, disjointRelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_25, type, disjoint_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_26, type, documentation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_27, type, domainSubclass_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_28, type, domainSubclass_THFTYPE_IiiioI: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_29, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIIiioIIiioIoIiioI: (($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_30, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiiIiioI: ($i > $i) > $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_31, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiiioIiioI: ($i > $i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_32, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_33, type, domain_THFTYPE_IiiioI: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_34, type, duration_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_35, type, equal_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_36, type, greaterThan_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_37, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_38, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIIiioIiioIioI: (($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_39, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiiIioI: ($i > $i) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_40, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiiiIioI: ($i > $i > $i) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_41, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiiioIioI: ($i > $i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_42, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_43, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiooIioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_44, type, instance_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_45, type, instrument_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_46, type, lAdditionFn_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_47, type, lAsymmetricRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_48, type, lBeginFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_49, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_50, type, lBinaryFunction_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_51, type, lBinaryPredicate_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_52, type, lCardinalityFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_53, type, lDayDuration_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_54, type, lDay_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_55, type, lEndFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_56, type, lEntity_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_57, type, lInheritableRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_58, type, lInteger_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_59, type, lIrreflexiveRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_60, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_61, type, lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_IiiiI: $i > $i > $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_62, type, lMonthFn_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_63, type, lMonth_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_64, type, lMultiplicationFn_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_65, type, lObject_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_66, type, lProcess_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_67, type, lQuantity_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_68, type, lRelationExtendedToQuantities_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_69, type, lRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_70, type, lSetOrClass_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_71, type, lSubtractionFn_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_72, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_73, type, lTemporalCompositionFn_THFTYPE_IiiiI: $i > $i > $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_74, type, lTemporalCompositionFn_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_75, type, lTemporalRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_76, type, lTernaryPredicate_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_77, type, lTimeInterval_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_78, type, lTotalValuedRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_79, type, lTransitiveRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_80, type, lUnaryFunction_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_81, type, lWhenFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_82, type, lWhenFn_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_83, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_84, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_85, type, lYear_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_86, type, lessThan_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_87, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_88, type, located_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_89, type, meetsTemporally_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_90, type, minus_THFTYPE_IiiiI: $i > $i > $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_91, type, n12_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_92, type, n1_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_93, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_94, type, n2_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_95, type, n3_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_96, type, orientation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_97, type, part_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_98, type, patient_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_99, type, rangeSubclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_100, type, range_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_101, type, relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_102, type, relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IiIiiIoI: $i > ($i > $i) > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_103, type, relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_104, type, result_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_105, type, subProcess_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_106, type, subclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_107, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIioIIioIoI: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_108, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_109, type, temporalPart_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_110, type, esk1_1: ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_111, type, esk2_2: $i > $i > $i).
0.17/0.48	thf(ax_049, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~((~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_049)).
0.17/0.48	thf(con, conjecture, ?[X14:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X14 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_2, plain, ((~(~((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_049])])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X14:$i]:(((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X14 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X14 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X136:$i]:((((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X136 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X136 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X136 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))&((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X136 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_6, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_10, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_11, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_7])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_13, plain, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_11])])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_15, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_14]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 279
0.17/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 114
0.17/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 182
0.17/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
0.17/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 176
0.17/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 19
0.17/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 2
0.17/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 2
0.17/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 15
0.17/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.17/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.17/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 1
0.17/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 2
0.17/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
0.17/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
0.17/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 0
0.17/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.48	# NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.17/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 11
0.17/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
0.17/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.17/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
0.17/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 158
0.17/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 221
0.17/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 4
0.17/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
0.17/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
0.17/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
0.17/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.17/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.17/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.17/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 19
0.17/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 1
0.17/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 7753
0.17/0.48	
0.17/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.48	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.17/0.48	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.17/0.48	# Total time               : 0.011 s
0.17/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 2424 pages
0.17/0.48	
0.17/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.48	# User time                : 0.011 s
0.17/0.48	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.17/0.48	# Total time               : 0.018 s
0.17/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1920 pages
0.17/0.48	EOF